Volume 3, Issue 2 (Spring 2023)
J Clin Sport Neuropsychol 2023, 3(2): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.SUMS.REC.1401.231
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Akhlaghi F, Rahimi C, Mohammadi N. The Comparison Effectiveness of Sensory Integration and Central Nervous System Reorganization Interventions on Memory of Students with Specific Learning Disorder. J Clin Sport Neuropsychol 2023; 3 (2) : 3
URL: http://jcsnp.ir/article-1-83-en.html
URL: http://jcsnp.ir/article-1-83-en.html
1- -, PhD Student in Clinical Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract: (134 Views)
Background and Purpose: Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) have a significant impact on students' performance, especially on their explicit and implicit memory. Identifying determinant intervention methods in this area is crucial. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Sensory Integration (SI) and Central Nervous System reorganization (CNSR) interventions on the explicit and implicit memory of students with SLD.
Method: The population of this research consisted of students with SLD referred to LD centers in Rafsanjan city in the academic year 2021-2022. Ninety were selected using purposive sampling and randomly assigned to three groups: SI intervention, CNSR intervention, or control group. The research tool was the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) explicit and implicit memory questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using repeated measures design and multivariate analysis of variance using SPSS-24.
Results: According to the findings, both SI and CNSR interventions were effective on the explicit and implicit memory of students with SLD in all three types of LD (reading/writing, mathematics, and combined). Furthermore, the results indicated that the effect of the SI intervention on increasing the explicit and implicit memory of students was greater than the CNSR intervention.
Conclusion: Based on these findings, it can be concluded that SI and CNSR interventions are effective on the explicit and implicit memory of students with SLD.
Method: The population of this research consisted of students with SLD referred to LD centers in Rafsanjan city in the academic year 2021-2022. Ninety were selected using purposive sampling and randomly assigned to three groups: SI intervention, CNSR intervention, or control group. The research tool was the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) explicit and implicit memory questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using repeated measures design and multivariate analysis of variance using SPSS-24.
Results: According to the findings, both SI and CNSR interventions were effective on the explicit and implicit memory of students with SLD in all three types of LD (reading/writing, mathematics, and combined). Furthermore, the results indicated that the effect of the SI intervention on increasing the explicit and implicit memory of students was greater than the CNSR intervention.
Conclusion: Based on these findings, it can be concluded that SI and CNSR interventions are effective on the explicit and implicit memory of students with SLD.
Article number: 3
Keywords: Central nervous system reorganization [MeSH], Explicit memory [MeSH], Implicit memory [MeSH], Sensory integration [MeSH], Specific learning disorder [MeSH]
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Clinical Sport Neurpsychology
Received: 2023/02/7 | Accepted: 2023/03/1 | Published: 2023/05/1
Received: 2023/02/7 | Accepted: 2023/03/1 | Published: 2023/05/1
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |